What is the limitation of relative dating in biology 321sexchat
Fourth, specific scientific arguments against Adam and Eve have proven not as forceful as many presently believe (Gauger 2012).
For example, some have claimed that effective population size estimates for the last several million years would not permit just two true humans to have lived during that time.
Irrational animals, including subhuman primates, are capable of complex sentient behaviors often approaching or imitating the rational activities of true man.
But an animal either possesses a spiritual, intellectual soul or not.
Thus at some point in time, true man suddenly appears—whether visible to modern science or not.
Before that time, all subhuman behavior manifests merely material sensory abilities.
While these qualitatively superior abilities are manifested through special forms of tool making or culture or art, they need not always be evident in the paleontological record.
The fact remains that a literal Adam and Eve are unchanging Catholic doctrine. Paul’s teaching is the fact that one man, Adam, committed original sin and that through the God-man, Jesus Christ, redemption was accomplished (Romans -21; 1 Cor. What they fail to notice, though, is that the Holy Father clearly insists that Scripture and the Magisterium affirm that original sin “proceeds from a sin truly committed by one Adam ” and that this sin is transmitted to all true human beings through generation (para. This proves that denial of a literal Adam (and his spouse, Eve) as the sole first genuinely human parents of all true human beings is not theologically tenable.